I was reading some comments and criticism on the new Spirit Science video about the God Particles… At first I was kind of in shock at all of the negativity on there. Charlie said it right in the video I posted in this blog - Sometimes what people do when giving Criticism is take the most amazing advice, ball it up in a fist and punch someone in the head with it!
I mean, that’s the vibe all over the comments…
And yet, even among all of the punching and kicking and screaming about how terrible of a person I am or how awful at science I am… there are still some wonderful comments and questions as well, and I’d like to do my best to answer them, sometimes with more questions that expands the thoughts more, and sometimes with some of my own theories and ideas as well.
Q1. How many papers on quantum physics has Mr. Evans had accepted for publication in a reputable journal?
Thank you for asking. If you looked at Michael’s website, you would actually see his work was mentioned in a scientific journal. You can find his Bio here, with links to the writings following that. In addition to that, he’s also been invited to speak at a number of conferences on Quantum Physics and Natural Philosophy.
In addition to that, just because we don’t have a huge number of scientists exploring this today does not mean that it is invalid. It simply means that they are developing ideas, and we need more time, effort, and energy to go into exploring what they mean.
This video serves simply as an idea, an exploration into a possibility that if true – would be a large part of our evolving understanding of the universe. And even if it’s not true, there are still key-components of this that is important, that could still add to our greater collective knowledge.
Q2. I have a question for you Spirit Science. What if everything you say is true? What if light is a solid based on the simplest forms of universal geometry? Wouldn’t this also mean that light has no specific speed?
Perhaps the speed of light from the sun has a specific speed because it has a specific wavelength and vibration. But then the light from a lamp however, is a different vibration of light, so perhaps it has a slightly lower speed. Maybe the light from the center of the galaxy has an even higher frequency of light, but its not one that we can measure yet with our current technology.
Q3. We only perceive the speed that light is allowed to travel within this reality. If light has less information stored within it wouldn’t that make the light less dense therefore vibrating the light at a higher frequency than we (humans) can perceive?
I think I get what you’re saying, that if light is moving at such a high speed outside of this dimension, then we wouldn’t be able to comprehend it. Also, what kinds of information can light hold to create with? Perhaps there’s both dense information like bricks, or light information like feathers. You can have “A pound of bricks or a pound of feathers” and they both weigh the same…maybe Light is the same way?
Q3 Cont. Wouldn’t this also mean that light speed travel IS possible but not by conventional internal combustion rockets…. but by a stationary craft that would vibrate in resonance to the light around it, thus moving space around it instead of physically moving. With out my babble my question simple is: Based on your postulations wouldn’t this mean that the speed of light isn’t finite but is a result of the vibratory frequency that the light manifests within?
Oh my god that’s so exciting!! Yes!! And most importantly, I think that using this information to create such technology is absolutely what we can do in this lifetime.
In regards to your question, yes, and with the same question as above. Which light are we measuring? The light from the lamp, or the light from the sun? Or perhaps the light from the glow on the fish in the deep sea. All different densities, yes – very similar, but different… How so? Might be an important question to ask here.
Q4. I do love your work but why wouldn’t space be the God Particle? With out space, nothing would exist.
That actually reminds me of something I was taught in Art class many years ago… It’s a fundamental piece of information for aspiring artists everywhere, something every artist learns at some point.
The lines of what you are drawing and containing, are just as important as the space around what you’re drawing. It’s called Negative Space, it’s the space around what you’re drawing that gives weight, dimension, and perspective to the drawing. Without a proper negative space, the positive space likewise is out of balance by default.
So if you think about it, with this idea that “Light is a Solid”, just as important as the geometry of the solid itself, is the space in between the solids. The space in-between all of them is the Yin to the Yang that is the Particles. Perhaps you could see it as Space is the Waves, and Particles is the Points. The male and female.
It’s just an idea, and I would love to explore this further with everyone!